Other than that they're obviously shorter, what are the design differences between boards meant for the ocean and boards meant for the lake? My son received a subscription to Surfer Magazine last Christmas from his lives-at-the-California-beach uncle, and in reading the articles I'm seeing a lot of parallels in board philosophies, fin setups, etc.
A lot of the ocean surfboards are advertised as being for wave heights of "ankle to waist", "ankle to chest", etc. Lots of us have waves that big behind our boats. Why don't we see more crossover from the existing surfboard makers to the wakesurf market? There's enough volume in wakesurfing to support the likes of Inland Surf, Ronix, Liquid Force, etc. busy - so why aren't we seeing more coming out of the shaping booth up and down the California coast? Anyone ever try a really short ocean board behind one of our boats? What happened?
Anyway, reading all of these Surfer Magazine articles and advertisements makes me wonder: What are the differences? I'm sure the collected wisdom here knows the answer. Thanks!
A lot of the ocean surfboards are advertised as being for wave heights of "ankle to waist", "ankle to chest", etc. Lots of us have waves that big behind our boats. Why don't we see more crossover from the existing surfboard makers to the wakesurf market? There's enough volume in wakesurfing to support the likes of Inland Surf, Ronix, Liquid Force, etc. busy - so why aren't we seeing more coming out of the shaping booth up and down the California coast? Anyone ever try a really short ocean board behind one of our boats? What happened?
Anyway, reading all of these Surfer Magazine articles and advertisements makes me wonder: What are the differences? I'm sure the collected wisdom here knows the answer. Thanks!
Comment