Originally posted by dom w. forte
View Post
did you do test to see if it was out of range, did the sensor you installed meet the same spec as the one you replaced by engine serial number
Ironically, your point supports mine: How would someone do the test(s) and confirm the specs without complete documentation? PCM cannot insist on following procedures if they do not make those procedures available.
And in case it needs saying again: I would not work on an engine that is still under warranty. (It would be a waste of my time and money - why not take advantage of the warranty I've already paid for?) However, that does not mean I would not want to learn about such an engine while it was still within warranty.
I will find it astonishing if PCM refuses to allow a paying customer to learn more about their product. Most companies welcome intense customer interest, because the more a customer knows about their product the more enthusiastic they become about those products. This leads to positive word-of-mouth advertising, the very best PR a company can possibly receive.
As an example of that, look at the fan clubs that exist for various automobile brands and models. The manufacturers actively encourage such activities because they promote brand loyalty, and generate new sales from both existing and new customers. All such products have warranties when new, too.
Let's consider Tige here. They are very responsive. They strongly support this very website (created by owners, not by the company, right?) to the point of even promoting it in their literature. They're not afraid to share technical data - when I asked about installing ballast they even shipped me the factory hull drawings showing where they install the thru-hulls for the factory ballast system (amongst a whole bunch of other technical documentation). And guess what - Tige has a warranty, too. A darned good one.
Supporting customers is the norm. PCM's position is the rare exception. No matter what reasons they give, the bottom line is that they are refusing to provide what the vast majority of other companies in similar markets willingly sell or even give away for free. I'm not asking for the formula for Coca-Cola; this isn't trade secret stuff. This is industry standard documentation.
The other kind of word-of-mouth advertising, where a customer vents their frustration with a company, is the very worst they can receive. And it's the company's own actions that determine which kind of word-of-mouth advertising they get.
Comment