If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Originally posted by spharis That still doesnt make sense.....3 blade causing you to go that slow.....I could see poor hole shot or something due to less surface area and a higher pitch, or leading edge; but to barely move. Your propshaft still turns 1 rev per 1.5 engine at that engine RPM, and usually a 3 blade means more speed and less on the low side. Sounds like it was installed wrong.
on second thought that is a retty drastic change on the pitch......4.5 inches, and less surface area.....
Not taking into account slippage....for every 1 turn of the prop, you should go foward 11.5 inches vs 16 inches on the stocker. You also went down in diameter and blades, so you probably lost about 25% surface fast. Rough estimate is that that netted about 5% decrease in overall speed + 30% decrease in pitch vs. distance, so even with no slippage, you would be going about 35% slower at useable RPM range, or old 50MPH = new 32.5MPH
Theoretical mph is calculated by multiplying propeller pitch and propeller rpm and dividing by 1056 (found that online).
So MPH w/4 blade = (16*(5000*.66))/1056
or 50MPH
MPH w/3 blade = (11.5*(5000*.66))/1056
or 36MPH
So either you were getting hella slippage, or the prop was installed wrong....either way......it would be alot slower.
I think the rule is to go from a 4 to a 3 @ about the same performance:
Maintain diameter, and increase the pitch 1".
WOW. I definitly didn't put that much thought into it. Not even close. The first thing I thought of was bring it back to the dealer. 2nd this sucks. 3rd thing whats for lunch.? I am going to just stick with the 4 blade I have at this point.
Originally posted by spharis That still doesnt make sense.....3 blade causing you to go that slow.....I could see poor hole shot or something due to less surface area and a higher pitch, or leading edge; but to barely move. Your propshaft still turns 1 rev per 1.5 engine at that engine RPM, and usually a 3 blade means more speed and less on the low side. Sounds like it was installed wrong.
on second thought that is a retty drastic change on the pitch......4.5 inches, and less surface area.....
Not taking into account slippage....for every 1 turn of the prop, you should go foward 11.5 inches vs 16 inches on the stocker. You also went down in diameter and blades, so you probably lost about 25% surface fast. Rough estimate is that that netted about 5% decrease in overall speed + 30% decrease in pitch vs. distance, so even with no slippage, you would be going about 35% slower at useable RPM range, or old 50MPH = new 32.5MPH
Theoretical mph is calculated by multiplying propeller pitch and propeller rpm and dividing by 1056 (found that online).
So MPH w/4 blade = (16*(5000*.66))/1056
or 50MPH
MPH w/3 blade = (11.5*(5000*.66))/1056
or 36MPH
So either you were getting hella slippage, or the prop was installed wrong....either way......it would be alot slower.
I think the rule is to go from a 4 to a 3 @ about the same performance:
Maintain diameter, and increase the pitch 1".
Hypothetically speaking, without prevarication or verboseness, I would take the coefficient of stored energy of the potential mass of the propeller divided by the ambient temperature to the power of 3, squared by the average temperature of Hawaii to determine the hyperbole of the angle of incidence. This, of course, to be used in accordance with Bertrand’s paradox. Unless, you determine the harmonic ratio of the propeller do be in conflict with Wittenbauer's Parallelogram...... or you have it on backwards
Seriously, very impressive research and analysis spharis!
After reading all this, I still have a question that I need some help on. I am looking at a 2005 24V to purchase and it has a three blade prop that came with the boat when purchased new. My 2000 2300V has a four blade prop. Will the three blade do as well on the 2005 as my 2000 or did someone shave some dollars on the purchase of the 2005? I do not know any of the particulars of the 2005 prop only that the 2005 has the 340 hp motor. Thanks
Originally posted by lee I have not heard of this before.
My dealer started putting those larger Acme 3 blades on all their new boats. I recently moved my boat from a 4 blade OJ to a 3 blade Acme. It makes a big difference on the holeshot. Check out this thread.
Cursed by a fortune cookie: "Your principles mean more to you than any money or success."
If you can get the size of the prop, and compare it against the stock one, you can work out what kind of top end you would possibly gain. As far as hole shot, there is no formula for that one.
Comment