The half slope/full slope solution is also better than one reversed (which as you said maybe being used) is that the voltage should never be the same. On the reversed slope there is a point where both values are about the same and then if one shifts, which one do you believe? In the end, these are the reasons that there are more limp homes (hopefully not walk homes) than before ETC.
A little history, there have been unattended accel on vehicles since the beginning of time (think stuck petals, cables, engine mounts failing, etc). When we all went to ETC most went to various schemes as above end ended up with systems that had about the same level of unattended accel as the old systems. One mfg didn't, and their complaints were much higher (5x if I remember) from their mechanical systems. That mfg ended up with some very high profile complaints a few years ago. I read a study that called out the likely reasons and that is due to flipping bits (yes, memory can change on it's own) and a lack of redundancy for those situations.
A little history, there have been unattended accel on vehicles since the beginning of time (think stuck petals, cables, engine mounts failing, etc). When we all went to ETC most went to various schemes as above end ended up with systems that had about the same level of unattended accel as the old systems. One mfg didn't, and their complaints were much higher (5x if I remember) from their mechanical systems. That mfg ended up with some very high profile complaints a few years ago. I read a study that called out the likely reasons and that is due to flipping bits (yes, memory can change on it's own) and a lack of redundancy for those situations.
Comment