Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What's "RMS" ??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by spharis View Post
    Don't know if Phil said it or not, but clipping can be caused at numerous points throughout the signal as it passes through. Head units, eq, and the amp. Most everyone can hear clipping if they know what to listen to.
    Well put.

    And no, since the discussion started with RMS as a tpic, I did not go into it.

    Spharis is right.
    It's not an optical illusion.
    It just looks like one.....

    Comment


      #32
      So, getting higher end equipment/wires/... will reduce the chances of clipping?

      Comment


        #33
        Basically, no or maybe.
        It comes down to gain matching all parts so that they hit clip at the same time.

        High-end stuff will clip, so the goal is the same, regardless what equipment you have.
        In general, wire will not affect clipping...
        It's not an optical illusion.
        It just looks like one.....

        Comment


          #34
          Clipping is caused 90% of the time by cranking the gains all the way up or going over 75% of a head units volume.
          http://www.wakeboatworld.com
          []) [] []V[] [])

          Comment


            #35
            clipping

            Originally posted by philwsailz View Post
            Hi Graham-

            Clipping in the laymans terms is when the amplifier is trying to put out a larger output waveform than it can. The input waveform cannot be fully replicated at the speaker terminals, as the amp does not have the output voltge amplitute necesary to recreate it.

            The result looks like the second and third pictures above.

            Clipping can be a contributor to thermal failure of the speaker due to excesive heat. At any point that the output signal is flat, as in the clipped off tops and bottoms of the output, the amp is producing a DC voltage output at a constant voltage. DC voltage in a speaker does nothing more than create heat.

            Loss of damping is a problem; damping is simply put the ability of the amp to smoothly control the woofer's motion. When one loses damping, the woofer can travel to extreme displacements, beyond its design intent. This can sound bad on its own, but can also cause other things. Many voice coils are aluminum, and if one hits the bottom of the motor structure, it will bend and probably rub or even get stuck. If it gets stuck, the voice coil will for sure over-heat with applied signal, as it cannot turn the electrical energy into motion, only heat.
            PHil
            Thanks I know understand how an underpowered amp that clips can damage a speaker. Just causes heat and no movement. I had always struggled to see how it did.

            Many thanks
            Graham

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by philwsailz View Post
              Now the long answer:
              fine print:
              Literally: "ROOT MEAN SQUARE"

              The wikkipedia link for anyone who cares to look:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_mean_square

              RMS is a measure of the magnitude of a varying quantity. Sound is necessarily made of waves. The electrical signal applied to a speaker is in effect a wave, speficically a complex AC signal with both varying frequency, (pitch) and amplitude, (volume). When measured, the eletrical wave-signal is ideally the exact same as the acoustic wave signal.

              Okay, enough pure science....


              As it relates to us 90% of the time, the use of RMS has come to, or can mean "REAL" i.e. RMS power is the amplifier's real power. For an amplifier, its RMS power output is the real measure by which two amplifiers can be honestly compared. DO NOT confuse this with PEAK POWER. PEAK POWER cannot be measured. It is an artificial specification with no basis in reality. PEAK POWER is often called WLS power. WLS is an acronym for When Lightning Strikes. If an amplifier ever truly was able to provide its advertised peak power output, it would be due to a lightning strike, and probably would not function after passing that amount of power...


              Many companies these days adhere to a specification called CEA-2006 which is an even more complete description of the output capabilities of the amplifier, as it specifies operating voltage at the power input terminals, output load, frequency, etc... It takes RMS power output to a different place, and allows a more precise comparison based solely on power output capabilities.


              You really cannot measure the power handing of a speaker. That being said, the acoustic sciences are well enough established that any manufacturer has a good idea of what amount of power their speaker will handle, with minimum mechanical or thermal stress, all while sounding more or less consistent without getting ragged or sloppy. In general, this will be advertised as the speaker's RMS power handling. As with amplifiers, two speakers can be compared based upon their power handling. When doing so, always use the RMS value, and not their PEAK value.

              When matching up speakers and amplifiers, it is simplest most of the time to make you speaker and amplifer seleciton based on advertised RMS power values, choosing the speaker and amps that have the same power output and handling.

              Did I stir up the muddy water and make it less clear?
              Oh hell You just gave me a refresher for a course I had in 1978 at SIU

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by da.bell View Post
                I was going to say that the last graph looks like some ppl's heart rate. Right 1lab?


                Your right it does but it usually represents some type of artificional intelligence when that persons brain clips their heart rate so bad. Unfortunately I am too much of a newbie to determine who's brain wave is causing so much clipping but I do know it is related to IQ problems. IMO this person again has a low IQ and I would bet > they are well under 50

                Sorry Phil and Mike for the RMS interuption.
                Please continue.
                Last edited by Guest; 02-15-2008, 04:01 AM.

                Comment

                Working...
                X