Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New ram 1500 Diesel I doing it....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by Carter13 View Post
    You forgot one other part of the equation Mr. President and that is the Eco Diesel is a $4500 upgrade over the Hemi. So if you get your calculator back out it will probably even out mileage wise to the Hemi. BTW the 5.7 Hemi averages 16 MPG.

    You just can't beat the torque of a diesel no matter what the CO$T.
    You could be right. Let me call my vice president and see if we can enact an executive order and give you a tax refund to help out. It's only fair that the rest of us help share the cost burden.

    Would a $4500 tax credit help you? After all, your helping us.
    Last edited by Obama4President2016; 02-26-2014, 11:09 AM.

    Comment


      #92
      Cummins is it I suppose.
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by Obama4President2016 View Post
        Actually, 20.5 MPG. Diesel is 15% more than petrol (per gallon)........so to be fair, comparing apples to apples, there is a .85 factor to validate this claim.
        Hmm - no, it's still 24 mpg. Do you factor in the 5.7L upgrade for $1,100 when you calculate the mileage in your Tundra?

        Comment


          #94
          Don't be Fueled! The bottom line is efficiency and the cost of fuel is part of the equation. As for the $4500 capitalization cost, 50% of that (at least) would come back at resale. Which would still be true 150K miles and 7 years from now.

          20.5 is the "relative" fuel efficiency. Is that better?

          If Diesel was 15% less, (which is should be), then the relative fuel efficiency would be 27.5 MPG.......AND THIS is something to write home about cuz at 45000K, your cap costs have been recouped.

          If jet fuel and diesel fuel were "off limits" to speculation, everyone would benefit except the greedy few (republicans).
          Last edited by Obama4President2016; 02-26-2014, 09:10 PM.

          Comment


            #95
            Mr President go give your Tundra a big hug for me.
            Formertigeowners.com
            I used to be a member in the past.

            Comment


              #96
              Again, are you doing this for every single engine option for any given truck? Your V8 Tundra drinks more gas than the V6 version so when you factor in that the engine costs more AND uses more gas, what's your real mileage? The V6 is rated at 16/20 and the V8 is rated 13/18 and the V8 cost's $1,100 more and over the lifetime of the truck, that's a LOT of cash extra! Using the EPA combined number, the V6 gets 17 and the V8 gets 15. Over 100,000 miles and gas at $3.50 per gallon, you will spend $2,744 more in fuel. Add in the $1,100 upgrade and now you are at $3,844 more than the V6.

              But you didn't include that in ANY of your comparisons here. Why is that?
              Last edited by Timmy!; 02-26-2014, 11:36 PM.

              Comment


                #97
                Nobody could explain that omission. A very important fact that wasn't told. Typical Liberal.
                I do all my own stunt work. hey ya'll watch dis.

                Comment


                  #98
                  ^

                  Comment


                    #99
                    It is true that some people just can't do math.
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Obama4President2016 View Post
                      Don't be Fueled! The bottom line is efficiency and the cost of fuel is part of the equation. As for the $4500 capitalization cost, 50% of that (at least) would come back at resale. Which would still be true 150K miles and 7 years from now.

                      20.5 is the "relative" fuel efficiency. Is that better?

                      If Diesel was 15% less, (which is should be), then the relative fuel efficiency would be 27.5 MPG.......AND THIS is something to write home about cuz at 45000K, your cap costs have been recouped.

                      If jet fuel and diesel fuel were "off limits" to speculation, everyone would benefit except the greedy few (republicans).
                      My question is why do you have to bring bullshit politics into a good discussion about trucks , you always act like a tottal ***, why????????????????

                      Comment


                        Their are millions out their suffering due to politics, this site is to take our minds off of stress and have fun with each other and their familys , there is nothing funning about your comments or your tasteless call sign!!!!!!!!!!

                        Comment


                          I am sorry I blew my top on here , I just get tired of that kind of blantant crap !

                          Comment


                            +1 - continue the ban of nobody aka obama4president -

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by dom w. forte View Post
                              I am sorry I blew my top on here , I just get tired of that kind of blantant crap !
                              You are FORGIVEN.

                              We love you, we love Obama, we love Republicans, we love Tige, we love Mastercraft......we love love love.

                              Comment


                                But we hate bad spellers!

                                Therefore you will be cursed with Nobody & Obama4President2016 presence for eternity.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X