Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EK Ballast Install

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • xpjim1
    replied
    But the check valve will stop that now

    Leave a comment:


  • eks
    replied
    Originally posted by xpjim1 View Post
    You also can leave the pump as is. Does not have tobe higher than the bag
    the reason I put it higher is to stop the sack from draining by itself after it is full. The pumps do not stop the watert from going out.

    Leave a comment:


  • chpthril
    replied
    Originally posted by xpjim1 View Post
    I agree with mike except for one item. You need a check valve on the vent line between the bag and the T or you will recirculate water bag into the bag when draining
    Agree. Good catch, Jim, thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • da.bell
    replied
    That looks like a much better deal chpthril... don't have to cut any more holes than he already has.

    Leave a comment:


  • eks
    replied
    Originally posted by chpthril View Post
    I do think that raising the pump higher then the sac will stop the unwanted back-flow, but, the pump will have to work harder to prime up as the water will drain away from the pump on both sides when off. Each time these pumps run dry, it shortens the impeller life. I still think it's best/easiest/most efficient, to drain from the bottom of the sac

    This is a crude drawing of how a guy on WW did his DIY Ballast Puppy install.
    I would have to install at least one more check valve to stop the pump from sucking air from the output vent. Perhaps another check valve after the T so water don't go back to the sack when empting.

    Leave a comment:


  • xpjim1
    replied
    You also can leave the pump as is. Does not have tobe higher than the bag

    Leave a comment:


  • xpjim1
    replied
    I agree with mike except for one item. You need a check valve on the vent line between the bag and the T or you will recirculate water bag into the bag when draining

    Leave a comment:


  • chpthril
    replied
    Originally posted by eks View Post
    I thought that by putting the pumps higher than the bag I would prevent the trickle of water.

    The pump would have to work to suck water out.
    I do think that raising the pump higher then the sac will stop the unwanted back-flow, but, the pump will have to work harder to prime up as the water will drain away from the pump on both sides when off. Each time these pumps run dry, it shortens the impeller life. I still think it's best/easiest/most efficient, to drain from the bottom of the sac

    This is a crude drawing of how a guy on WW did his DIY Ballast Puppy install.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • da.bell
    replied
    there are many, many different ways you could do this. You can try that way out and see if it works first. That way you don't have to drill another hole into the side of the boat.

    Leave a comment:


  • eks
    replied
    And by putting the intake on the top of the bag, I help the pump not to struggle with pressure when the bag is almost full.

    Leave a comment:


  • eks
    replied
    Originally posted by da.bell View Post
    Yes, but the check values are there to direct flow. Per your schema (this is just my opinion) with or without the check values will do the exact same thing. Will allow the water to go into the bags via the pump and exit the bags without the pump. Someone posted a schema of the X-Star's ballast system and did you notice that the exit holes were on the side of the boat? This helps to promote the water to stay in the bags and not release a trickle of water..
    I thought that by putting the pumps higher than the bag I would prevent the trickle of water.

    The pump would have to work to suck water out.

    Leave a comment:


  • eks
    replied
    Originally posted by chpthril View Post
    I agree, Let me play around with the diag and see if I can "draw" What I think will be the simplest solution.
    Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • da.bell
    replied
    Yes, but the check values are there to direct flow. Per your schema (this is just my opinion) with or without the check values will do the exact same thing. Will allow the water to go into the bags via the pump and exit the bags without the pump. Someone posted a schema of the X-Star's ballast system and did you notice that the exit holes were on the side of the boat? This helps to promote the water to stay in the bags and not release a trickle of water..

    Leave a comment:


  • chpthril
    replied
    Originally posted by da.bell View Post
    IMO, you are going to have the same problem of the bag being emptied if you use the same hole in the hull for your intake and outtake. I would take the outtake hole and put it up near the rubrails.
    I agree, Let me play around with the diag and see if I can "draw" What I think will be the simplest solution.

    Leave a comment:


  • eks
    replied
    Originally posted by da.bell View Post
    IMO, you are going to have the same problem of the bag being emptied if you use the same hole in the hull for your intake and outtake. I would take the outtake hole and put it up near the rubrails.
    it is just one hose for both intake and outtake.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X