I have been experimenting with weighting my 24Ve to get the best wake, both surf and wakeboard. My sac inventory is as follows:
2 FlyHigh V-drive sacs in each rear locker, 400 lbs each.
1 Integrated bow sac in the bow, 600 lbs.
1 750 sac that I can place in the center of the boat
2 155 lb fat brick for adjustment and such.
My first experience was with just the huge 750 in the center of the boat. This gave me a great surf wake, and a monster wb wake. Boat also handled well. The only problem is this huge sac in the middle of the boat:
Here are a couple of pictures of the wake with that setup, surfing.
and the goofy side:
The wake was big, longer than normal, and clean, compared to stock wake. Much more room to surf in.
Then I bought the vdrive sacs and bow sacs, to replace the 750. I was very dissapointed. First, any more than like 350 lbs in the bow, and the boat starts to handle like a tank. I even tried vdrives filled, 500 in the bow, and the 750 in rear center of the boat. The wake was long, but not very big, and the boat didn't handle so well. Sorry, don't have pictures of this setup. Or I probably do, but don't know which ones exactly.
So this last tuesday, I am towing a bunch of kids at Lake Almanor. I volunteered to teach HS kids in the youth group how to WB and WS. There were 14 of us in the boat, and so I only filled the vdrive sacs, nothing else. I put 2-3 people in the bow, and the rest in the cockpit. Most on one side, the small ones, that didn't fit on surf side say anywhere. The wake was huge, long, and the best I have ever seen. Putting almost all the sac weight in the back really made a difference. I made sure I only had 3 kids (prob 130 each) up front to keep the bow light. Boat handled great, and monster wake. Sorry I don't have great pics, but we forgot the normal lens for the Canon, and only had the 75-300 zoom.
Here is WB wake:
Here is surf wake, but too tight:
So I go out today with just my family. Its been 2 weeks since its been just us. A lot of entertaining. I just fill the 2 vdrives, and the fat brick. I put the fat brick on the seat with us, and we all get on one side. I would guess with the fat brick, about 800 lbs on one side with the cooler, FB and all my family. The wake was great, just about as good as almanor. Just maybe a bit less. But just as long and big. The thing is, I think with my hull, the extra weight up front, just negates what the taps plate is doing. I mean, you can push the bow down with the taps plate regardless of the weight. There is a lot of pressure on the plate pushing the bow down. But if you have a bunch of weight in the bow, putting taps up to 8, is not going to raise the bow as much as it would if it was light. I noticed with this better wake, I was definitely running with the bow higher than normal. I actually had to sit up sometimes to see, and almost pulled out the bolster seat. So, I may be wrong, and open for discussion, but I think too much weight in the bow, just negates the flexibility of the convexV hull and the taps. Better off with more weight in back, and use the taps to bring the bow down if you need to. When I had the big 750 in the center, or the sac filled in the bow, I could not get the bow up, and wake suffered. I am seriously considering getting 550s for the back now and experimenting with that.
Ok, now for the pictures (11.2 mph, taps at 7):
Reg side:
Goofy:
And now the WB wake, with taps at 4, 22mph:
Anyway, I have been having a blast experimenting and playing. And the Tige just seems to be a great platform to shape your wake with weight, and still have so much adjustment with TAPS. But I would def rethink the 60/40 stuff I have read many places. It SEEMS to me (IMHO) that you def want to keep the bow unloaded enough to give you the ability to keep the bow up and displace more water. This may be more of a issue with the Tige ConvexV, or maybe even the 24Ve, I don't know. But I thought I would share.
If you feel like seeing all of the images we took today, if you are a pic junky:
http://www.bighead.net/pics/2007-07-13_WB_WS/
2 FlyHigh V-drive sacs in each rear locker, 400 lbs each.
1 Integrated bow sac in the bow, 600 lbs.
1 750 sac that I can place in the center of the boat
2 155 lb fat brick for adjustment and such.
My first experience was with just the huge 750 in the center of the boat. This gave me a great surf wake, and a monster wb wake. Boat also handled well. The only problem is this huge sac in the middle of the boat:
Here are a couple of pictures of the wake with that setup, surfing.
and the goofy side:
The wake was big, longer than normal, and clean, compared to stock wake. Much more room to surf in.
Then I bought the vdrive sacs and bow sacs, to replace the 750. I was very dissapointed. First, any more than like 350 lbs in the bow, and the boat starts to handle like a tank. I even tried vdrives filled, 500 in the bow, and the 750 in rear center of the boat. The wake was long, but not very big, and the boat didn't handle so well. Sorry, don't have pictures of this setup. Or I probably do, but don't know which ones exactly.
So this last tuesday, I am towing a bunch of kids at Lake Almanor. I volunteered to teach HS kids in the youth group how to WB and WS. There were 14 of us in the boat, and so I only filled the vdrive sacs, nothing else. I put 2-3 people in the bow, and the rest in the cockpit. Most on one side, the small ones, that didn't fit on surf side say anywhere. The wake was huge, long, and the best I have ever seen. Putting almost all the sac weight in the back really made a difference. I made sure I only had 3 kids (prob 130 each) up front to keep the bow light. Boat handled great, and monster wake. Sorry I don't have great pics, but we forgot the normal lens for the Canon, and only had the 75-300 zoom.
Here is WB wake:
Here is surf wake, but too tight:
So I go out today with just my family. Its been 2 weeks since its been just us. A lot of entertaining. I just fill the 2 vdrives, and the fat brick. I put the fat brick on the seat with us, and we all get on one side. I would guess with the fat brick, about 800 lbs on one side with the cooler, FB and all my family. The wake was great, just about as good as almanor. Just maybe a bit less. But just as long and big. The thing is, I think with my hull, the extra weight up front, just negates what the taps plate is doing. I mean, you can push the bow down with the taps plate regardless of the weight. There is a lot of pressure on the plate pushing the bow down. But if you have a bunch of weight in the bow, putting taps up to 8, is not going to raise the bow as much as it would if it was light. I noticed with this better wake, I was definitely running with the bow higher than normal. I actually had to sit up sometimes to see, and almost pulled out the bolster seat. So, I may be wrong, and open for discussion, but I think too much weight in the bow, just negates the flexibility of the convexV hull and the taps. Better off with more weight in back, and use the taps to bring the bow down if you need to. When I had the big 750 in the center, or the sac filled in the bow, I could not get the bow up, and wake suffered. I am seriously considering getting 550s for the back now and experimenting with that.
Ok, now for the pictures (11.2 mph, taps at 7):
Reg side:
Goofy:
And now the WB wake, with taps at 4, 22mph:
Anyway, I have been having a blast experimenting and playing. And the Tige just seems to be a great platform to shape your wake with weight, and still have so much adjustment with TAPS. But I would def rethink the 60/40 stuff I have read many places. It SEEMS to me (IMHO) that you def want to keep the bow unloaded enough to give you the ability to keep the bow up and displace more water. This may be more of a issue with the Tige ConvexV, or maybe even the 24Ve, I don't know. But I thought I would share.
If you feel like seeing all of the images we took today, if you are a pic junky:
http://www.bighead.net/pics/2007-07-13_WB_WS/
Comment