RZ2 vs 22VE GPH.

[evil0ne]

1D10T error I'd guess.

[evil0ne]

I'm guessing your numbers are from the boattest.com site? If so, it gets even better, the 24Ve is listed at 6.3gph at 3000rpm.

[Domsz06]

I would venture to say it's an error in their math, or sensors. How are they judging the use of fuel?

[turbonine]

I looked into this and noticed the engine on the 24ve and 22ve were the 340 and the RZ2 had the 360. Could this be the difference? What a huge difference in GPH for that extra power.

I would really like to know as I am trying to make a quick decision between the 340 and 360 for my RZ4 in this thread.

[evil0ne]

I get fantastic fuel mileage out of my 6.0L so I'm still siding on an error. I get better range then my buddies Sea Ray 200 Sundeck which is very similar to this test: http://www.boattest.com/oem/test-res...d=&from_gi=yes. The difference is that they have the Bravo III.

[sparky216]

It really is hard to gauge gph, because cruising and wakboarding/tubing/surfing all burn fuel different. You'd be suprised how much better gph you get as the riders get better. Less stopping and picking up riders really saves on fuel. Since my gauge never worked, I always go on the 4gph rule, and have yet to ever run out of fuel....anyway just my

[Domsz06]

nice sparky, never thought of that.

[CP3]

Since my gauge never worked, I always go on the 4gph rule, and have yet to ever run out of fuel....anyway just my

So does that work even if you are fully loaded with ballast?

[whitlock87]

I have a switch-v ( 20 -v) with a 340 5.7L engine.
With boarding I get around 5gph and tubing I get 7gph.
( I have a flow meter)