Perhaps...
Years ago it may have been true. The technology has been around for so long and used in so many applications that most of the kinks have been worked out. The computer does have a fail-safe mode that it can use when the sensors fail. Of course if you have total computer failure you are toast. There are still single points of failure on a carbed engine that will leave you looking for a tow.
I find the biggest advantage of the computerized engine is the diagnostic capability. My truck gave me a fault light when climbing a hill that went out went I started down the hill. Turns out that the number 3 plug was misfiring under heavy load. That would be hard to determine with a carbed engine.
So I would take fuel injection over carbed given the reliability of todays systems, diagnostic capability, fewer emissions, longer engine life, and better economiy.
Originally posted by condor86
well i have to disagree a bit...there are far more things to go wrong with a fuel injected engine than a carbed engine ie computer problems, injector problems, etc...
well i have to disagree a bit...there are far more things to go wrong with a fuel injected engine than a carbed engine ie computer problems, injector problems, etc...
I find the biggest advantage of the computerized engine is the diagnostic capability. My truck gave me a fault light when climbing a hill that went out went I started down the hill. Turns out that the number 3 plug was misfiring under heavy load. That would be hard to determine with a carbed engine.
So I would take fuel injection over carbed given the reliability of todays systems, diagnostic capability, fewer emissions, longer engine life, and better economiy.
Comment