Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Z3 Wakesurf Wake STOCK

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Z3 Wakesurf Wake STOCK

    We have received a lot of requests to test the Z3 with just the stock system, not the competition wake. We have been quite crazed to make sure we had a competition ready wake in time for the West Coast Wakesurf Open that we kinda past that over. Well now that our comp wake testing is done, we did a test with just me and the kids and we left the extra sacs on the pontoon boat. No extra lead, water, nothing but us and the Pro Stock system. Not even a cooler or ice.

    Before I get to the pics and video, it looks bigger than you would expect, that has a lot to do with the way this is weighted. When we do a comp wake, we may use lead but we try to build the wake with just water, and I personally want to see a boat build a comp wake with nothing but water, all hidden away, and all plumbed or easily plumbable. The RZ2 for instances was like that, everything was built around the L-Shaped custom sacs put in the corner. So each custom sac probably held about 1200 lbs or so (maybe less in reality) and then a 250lb hard tank under the corners and 2 400 lb tanks up front on either side. (the Pro System) The thing is, with the RZ2 you filled one corner with 1200 and the 250, nothing on the other side and then only a single front tank on surf side. So you end up with a comp/weekend warrior weighting of about 1850 lbs plus people. The rub rail is on the water at this weight, but it felt reasonably safe and it put out a great wake. Of course sometimes we weighted it more or had more people or whatever, but that was basically our daily weight. You couldn't add weight to the other side or more to the front for the best wake.

    The same went for the RZ2 Pro Stock weighting. You filled up the rear corner and then that was it, very little if any up front to have decent push with the smaller weight, but it still was a great stock wake.

    So ballast weight of RZ2 comp weight: 1850
    ballast weight of RZ2 pro stock weight: 650

    Now the Z3 you start with the SAME L-Shaped custom sac. Even though we don't have ours yet, that is why we used a Jumbo and a 440 on the corner and side to simulate the L-Shaped sac. About 1100 in the surf corner plus the 250 hard tank. But the Z3 wants weight all over so you have to add weight to match the corner weight, so you end up with 1000 lbs up front and then 600 or so on the opposite side plus people. That is how you end up close to 3k on the Z3 for comp weight plus people, yet the rub rail is still 4 inches off of the water and you are only listed 8 degrees. It doesn't feel that heavily loaded at all and the motor is working about 3k RPM like it does on all our other Tiges.

    Same goes for the stock system on the Z3. Because of the way the boat likes to be weighted for the optimum wake, you end up using 650 in the surf corner, ~325 in the opposite corner, 500 front surf corner, and then ~250 opposite surf corner. So the Pro Stock system on the Z3 for best wake you are using 1725 lbs!

    So ballast weight of Z3 comp weight: ~2900
    ballast weight of Z3 pro stock weight: ~1725

    I say all of that first, because when you see the pictures and video of the stock weighting, it doesn't look like what you would get from a stock wakesurf boat with 650 total in the corner. In the RZ2 you are using 33% of the total ballast to make the wakesurf wake, and then in the Z3 you are using 75% of the total ballast. And from the beginning, Rick and Danny from Tige told me this is what they were going for.

    So here is the setup. It was quick because after playing and learning the boat with more weight, I was able to quickly figure what it should be stock, and we nailed it quick. This thing/likes needs that weight up front. I filled up surf side 100% front and back, then I did front 50% on opposite. Then I setup my clinometer and with people situated filled opposite rear corner until I got about 8 degrees. That was rear about 50% also.



    Jesse was first.



    Thomas was cold, but having fun. The wake was about as long, especially cuz the curl was smaller.





    Trying to get air.



    Maddie can't pump, and can't recover well, but she seemed to do just as well with the stock wake.



    RJ was very shocked, he did ride it stock in Texas, along with Dennis, and they both said it had tremendous push. But conditions were bad, now they were cold, but great conditions. He said it had great length, and tons of push, about as much as before, he said he couldn't really tell the difference. The wake was not as tall, and he said the lip is better on the comp wake, but other than that, if this is all he had to surf on he would be more than content.



    He liked the lip good enough.





    So he rode backside, and he can't pump almost at all, Dennis rides much better backside than he does, but he got way back and rode back in several times.







    So now for some raw video. I filmed in 1080P this time for the highest resolution, so feel free to hit full screen on this one. I also thought about it ahead of time and took the time to try to take identical on the water shots from both sides and compare at the end of the video. People argue with me all the time that EVERY boat will make a better wake on one side due to prop rotation. Watch the video all the way through, and tell me again. ;-) The wakes are not only the same on both sides but each side reacts the same to speed and taps. Both sides are setup in the video EXACTLY the same, except for maybe a bit off when compensating for driver, but Maddie is driving. TAPS is at 5 in all of this. My only complaint is that when comp weighted, you can go taps from 3-6, taps at 1 and 2 are dirty. At stock its dirty all the way to 3 or so, and 5 really cleans it up. Anyway, here is the video.

    NOTE: This video is different than what I posted on WW, more fun. Its shot in 1080P, so to get the full effect, hit full screen mode. Show this video to people when they argue that all boats make a better wake on one side.

    http://wake9.com/

    #2
    Good enough and pics. Thanks for your contributions. You take a lot of time get this stuff nailed down so others don't have to.

    Comment


      #3
      Thanks Ragboy!! This will help me out with my pro ballast set up until I want to add more later.. Your the man!

      Comment


        #4
        Nice pics! That's plenty for the average rider to have a blast with and they can add more as they grow!

        Comment


          #5
          Thank you Ragboy! You help inspire us to make weekend warrior/comp waves.

          Reading this I need to get weight in the bow of our RZ2. We have been riding with zero weight in the bow and the custom surf sac in the rear ~1,200 lbs. I do not have the individual sacs in the bow so I will need to add 200+ lbs on the surf side. Looks like 3 or 4 five gallon buckets full of concrete will do it.
          "You're rather attractive for a beautiful girl with a great body."

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Booms View Post
            Reading this I need to get weight in the bow of our RZ2. We have been riding with zero weight in the bow and the custom surf sac in the rear ~1,200 lbs. I do not have the individual sacs in the bow so I will need to add 200+ lbs on the surf side. Looks like 3 or 4 five gallon buckets full of concrete will do it.
            I do not think only surf side bow weight is a requirement to surf an RZ2 but it does help. The wave seems to be a little mushier with the U sack. If you have a U sack, try filling the bow sack AFTER you have your rear surf corner filled -- that results in an asymetric distribution of water in the front sack (as long as it is not full).

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by ragboy View Post
              This thing/likes needs that weight up front. I filled up surf side 100% front and back, then I did front 50% on opposite. Then I setup my clinometer and with people situated filled opposite rear corner until I got about 8 degrees. That was rear about 50% also.
              Great vid -- the split screen at the end was really effective.

              Was the 100%/50% bow split an assumption? Or did you also test 100%/100%?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Duncan View Post
                I do not think only surf side bow weight is a requirement to surf an RZ2 but it does help. The wave seems to be a little mushier with the U sack. If you have a U sack, try filling the bow sack AFTER you have your rear surf corner filled -- that results in an asymetric distribution of water in the front sack (as long as it is not full).
                Duncan - Thanks for the input. I have the U sack but never installed/plumbed. I am too lazy.
                I already have concrete buckets. I will try those and see how it works. Each 5 gallon bucket of concrete weighs 90lbs. That allows me to move them around with ease.
                "You're rather attractive for a beautiful girl with a great body."

                Comment


                  #9
                  OK Im throwing it out there, get your hands on a R20! ha ha...
                  Squid
                  squidswake@gmail.com

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Hey Ragboy, while we're waiting for our Z3 to arrive in about 3 weeks (and suffering through a chilly spring in Canada...), maybe you can answer a question for me.

                    We ordered ours with the Pro Ballast, but I thought Tony from Tige was saying it was a single triangle shaped ~1000lb sac in the bow. I know there are dual pumps but I just assumed that was to speed up filling/emptying of the larger tank.

                    Your post seems to imply that either there are 2 bow sacs or that there's a separation that would allow you to fill one side or the other independently?

                    If there are two sacs or even just the ability to fill one side or the other of a single divided sack independently then I'm even more excited....

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by neildorin View Post
                      Hey Ragboy, while we're waiting for our Z3 to arrive in about 3 weeks (and suffering through a chilly spring in Canada...), maybe you can answer a question for me.

                      We ordered ours with the Pro Ballast, but I thought Tony from Tige was saying it was a single triangle shaped ~1000lb sac in the bow. I know there are dual pumps but I just assumed that was to speed up filling/emptying of the larger tank.

                      Your post seems to imply that either there are 2 bow sacs or that there's a separation that would allow you to fill one side or the other independently?

                      If there are two sacs or even just the ability to fill one side or the other of a single divided sack independently then I'm even more excited....
                      Pro Ballast on Z3 has 2 separate Front Sacks, can fill/empty independently

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Booms View Post
                        Thank you Ragboy! You help inspire us to make weekend warrior/comp waves.

                        Reading this I need to get weight in the bow of our RZ2. We have been riding with zero weight in the bow and the custom surf sac in the rear ~1,200 lbs. I do not have the individual sacs in the bow so I will need to add 200+ lbs on the surf side. Looks like 3 or 4 five gallon buckets full of concrete will do it.
                        I can remember a few times we had trouble with one front pump and we filled only one side front and then switched sides as needed in the back, it didn't make that much difference at all where the 400 lbs came from up front. I think the u shaped sac up front should be fine. We only did 800 up front sometimes to lengthen the wave, but only when it was flat, I never liked putting that much weight in the front of the RZ2.

                        Originally posted by Duncan View Post
                        Great vid -- the split screen at the end was really effective.

                        Was the 100%/50% bow split an assumption? Or did you also test 100%/100%?
                        Too much weight up front will take away push, we did try and it wasn't better. Basically what we did, if you have too little bow weight on the Z3 you will know, it drags the butt and the wake doesn't' shape right, if you have just a bit too little, its very washed out, you add to front to clean the wake and then stop. At least that is what we did.

                        Originally posted by neildorin View Post
                        Hey Ragboy, while we're waiting for our Z3 to arrive in about 3 weeks (and suffering through a chilly spring in Canada...), maybe you can answer a question for me.

                        We ordered ours with the Pro Ballast, but I thought Tony from Tige was saying it was a single triangle shaped ~1000lb sac in the bow. I know there are dual pumps but I just assumed that was to speed up filling/emptying of the larger tank.

                        Your post seems to imply that either there are 2 bow sacs or that there's a separation that would allow you to fill one side or the other independently?

                        If there are two sacs or even just the ability to fill one side or the other of a single divided sack independently then I'm even more excited....
                        They have to be independent, because we can fill one front side and then it fills up and leaks out, then you can fill up the other side til it fills up. If they were one with 2 pumps, then when you fill one side, the other would not fill. Unless I am missing something, I am fairly sure its 2 tanks.
                        http://wake9.com/

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by ragboy View Post
                          I can remember a few times we had trouble with one front pump and we filled only one side front and then switched sides as needed in the back, it didn't make that much difference at all where the 400 lbs came from up front. I think the u shaped sac up front should be fine. We only did 800 up front sometimes to lengthen the wave, but only when it was flat, I never liked putting that much weight in the front of the RZ2.
                          I am not trying to purposefully hijack the Z3 thread but ...

                          In contrast to the Z3, I think the RZ2 surf wake is almost entirely dependent on burying the rub rail. An RZ2 just does not dig as big a whole in the water as a Z3 so you really have to push that rear corner down deep.

                          On the RZ2, off side bow weight decreases surf-side listing and brings the rub rail up out of the water. Now, if you have plenty of ballast/people such that it is no problem burying the rub rail, then go ahead and add weight to off-side bow to further increase the pocket (I suspect this is the case for Ragboy's RZ2 observation above). But a custom 1k sack with 2 or 3 passengers is usually NOT enough to bury the rail on an RZ2, in which case avoid off-side bow weight. Add a 150 pound brick on the swim platform and 4-5 people, then you can do whatever you want in the bow.

                          Again, a bow U sack works fine in the RZ2; you just will not list quite as far over and need relatively more people/ballast in the rear.

                          back to regularly scheduled Z3 programming

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I mostly agree with that, except I think the list angle and burying the rub rail is about the shape of the wake more than anything.

                            List gets the shape just right, and the RZ2 and the 24Ve need a heavy list. The Z3 doesn't require so much list, and you can put more weight and displace more water. And for some reason that hull just sinks that butt down. If you don't have enough weight in the front, the motor is just working like a mad man and the wave is horrible because its just dragging the butt. Never seen any of our boats do that. But get that weight in the front to counter, and it just sings.

                            The Z3 has just raised the bar to a new level, and will be the new benchmark. Just the fact that you use 75% of the full ballast to make the wakesurf wake, and get that full benefit out of the box is worth the price of admission.
                            http://wake9.com/

                            Comment


                              #15
                              All I can say is two things.

                              Thanks Ragboy for all the tests and posting you do.

                              And I really need a Z3.
                              Wake Up or Stay On Shore!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X